2 Corinthians--a Very Misunderstood Epistle

Many commentaries focus on Paul's defense of his ministry. Paul's main purposes have little to do with defending his ministry. The most common themes are: 1) reconciliation--between us and God, between fellow believers within the church, and between Paul and the Corinthians; 2) exhortation to ministry--Paul has been steadfast and uses his example to spur the Corinthians to look beyond their petty squabbles and reach out to the world, no matter how difficult it will be, because we have God and the rest of the world needs to be in relationship with Him. Be bold, be brave, get out of the pew!

Monday, August 26, 2019

Lessons from Isaac’s Binding

If you’ve read many of my blogs, you may have ascertained that I relish in the contrary view. Often in staff meetings, I might play the Devil’s Advocate against my own proposals to make sure they are robust. Likewise, views of scripture that challenge the Sunday-School, simplistic, milk-faith interpretations make me go deeper in who I believe God is. Recently reading about Abraham has done the same thing. Who God picks seems to be the ones who need God more: childless Abram and Hannah, second-sons Isaac and Jacob, and younger sons Joseph and David and Solomon, strangers without families like Moses in Pharoah’s court (later in Jethro’s Midian) and the Moabitess Ruth.

Isaac’s story of his binding by Abraham as a test of faith can be viewed in contrary ways. Similar to Abraham’s questioning of God before the destruction of Sodom and Gemorrah. This incident is viewed most often as an argument with God to try and save the two cities; I enjoy the perspective, perhaps more likely, that it’s Abraham’s way of interviewing God on His perspective on sin and justice—“Would You destroy them even if there are fifty righteous men there?” Perhaps the binding of Isaac is not a test of Abraham’s faith but Abraham’s test of God. We tend to view it as God wondering about Abraham’s faith. Did he trust God enough to sacrifice the sign of the blessing that meant he would be the father of nations? Would he unquestioningly travel a far distance, as a very old man, climb a mountain and bind his son and then kill him without knowing for certain that God would provide another son? There are clues that Abraham’s faith allowed him to carry through with the command: “We will return” the servants are told when the two set off from the base of the mountain; “The Lord will provide a sheep” Abraham answers Isaac’s query about the missing element for a burnt offering.

Genesis 22 starts with “...God tested Abraham’s faith”. His faith has already been tested: leaving Ur, Haran, trusting God to provide for a son even though he and Sarah are beyond middle-age. It seems if God is testing Abraham, Abraham is just as likely to test God’s promise. “Okay, Lord, you provided this son who seems to be THE sign of that the blessing/promise has arrived. You’re asking me to sacrifice him and I’ll call your bluff because I don’t think Sarah and I have it in us to have another child. I have rarely hesitated in other calls to action You’ve given, so I won’t now either.” The Lord made a covenant with Abraham and holds Himself to making it happen. Abraham is looking forward to seeing how He will do it.

No comments:

Post a Comment